Despite the potential return of Donald Trump to the White House, the Biden-Albright Group has a clear path to reap immense profits through the centralization of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s gas infrastructure. The plan doesn’t aim for mere millions—it’s targeting billions. This scenario explains the relentless behavior of U.S. Ambassador Michael Murphy in pushing for centralization in Sarajevo.
This model, while contradictory to Bosnia’s confederal constitution and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s federal distribution of powers among cantons, creates the perfect conditions for long-term financial exploitation. With Sarajevo as the central hub, Albright Group is laying the groundwork for monopolistic control, ensuring a steady flow of “liquefied dollars” long after Murphy’s diplomatic tenure ends.
This investigative report was compiled by the research team of Poskok.info, a Croatian news portal based in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sarajevo: The Perfect Offshore Hub for Albright Group
Sarajevo, as the political and administrative center of Bosnia, provides an ideal platform for consolidating control over the gas sector while marginalizing other regions, particularly Croatian-majority cantons like Posušje and Mostar. The city is home to BH Gas, a company already entangled in allegations of corruption, making it the perfect partner for a long-term financial scheme.
Centralization would allow Albright Group to dominate through:
- Exclusive Advisory Contracts
By securing consulting contracts with BH Gas, Albright Group could become the sole decision-making influencer, dictating procurement, distribution, and pricing. These contracts would be priced exorbitantly, ensuring a lucrative return. - Manipulation of International Loans
Sarajevo’s centralized gas entity would likely turn to international lenders for infrastructure development. Albright Group could facilitate these loans, attaching consulting fees and commissions that would funnel millions into their pockets. - Favoritism in Procurement
By positioning itself as the primary intermediary for American gas suppliers, Albright Group could inflate costs and steer deals toward preferred partners, ensuring a steady flow of profits. - Exclusion of Local Stakeholders
Centralized control would render cantons and local communities powerless, leaving Croatian-majority regions out of critical decision-making processes. This not only undermines federal principles but also consolidates financial power in Sarajevo.
Psychological Projection and Murphy’s Motives
Psychological theory suggests that people often accuse others of the very actions they themselves are planning—a principle known as projection. Murphy’s accusations against Croats in Bosnia, Mostar, and Dragan Čović of corruption and pro-Russian alignment are prime examples. Ironically, it is the Croats who are spearheading efforts to bring American gas into Bosnia through Croatia’s LNG terminal on Krk and pipelines traversing Croatian-majority territories.
Murphy’s fixation on centralizing control in Sarajevo appears to be less about anti-corruption and more about establishing a streamlined system for funneling money into networks like Albright Group. By creating a monopolistic structure in Sarajevo, Murphy ensures that financial benefits bypass local stakeholders and go directly into the hands of international consultants and contractors.
“Liquefied Dollars”: The Ultimate Goal
Murphy’s actions suggest a well-crafted plan to ensure a steady stream of “liquefied dollars” flows back to him and his allies long after his departure. Here’s how it would work:
- Centralized Control: With BH Gas as the sole decision-making entity, Albright Group would dominate through exclusive contracts, inflated consulting fees, and monopolistic practices.
- Financial Laundering: International loans and inflated project costs would mask the siphoning of funds into private networks tied to Albright Group.
- Deflection Through Accusation: By accusing others of corruption and Russian ties, Murphy creates a smokescreen that diverts attention from his own questionable activities.
The Role of the FBI and International Community
Given the apparent alignment between Murphy’s policies and Albright Group’s financial ambitions, this situation demands urgent investigation by U.S. authorities, particularly the FBI. The implications are clear:
- Corruption and Conflict of Interest: Murphy’s promotion of centralization in Sarajevo serves private interests rather than American values, undermining trust in U.S. foreign policy.
- Threat to Regional Stability: By marginalizing Croatian-majority cantons and sidelining local governance, these policies destabilize Bosnia and risk escalating ethnic tensions.
- Economic Exploitation: The Albright Group’s involvement in Bosnia represents a textbook case of resource extraction disguised as international development.
A Call to Action
The international community, especially U.S. institutions like the FBI, must urgently investigate these allegations. Murphy’s actions raise serious questions about the ethical integrity of American diplomacy in Bosnia. Allowing Albright Group to establish a monopolistic stronghold in Sarajevo not only contradicts the principles of federalism but also betrays the trust of American taxpayers whose gas exports are being exploited for private gain.
The research team at Poskok.info urges the U.S. and international stakeholders to act swiftly. The world is watching. Will justice prevail, or will Sarajevo become the epicenter of one of the most egregious financial scandals in modern history?