Should Croats Leave NATO?

The ambassador of the strongest NATO member, the United States, in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) from 2007 until today, is systematically targeting the only people in BiH who are citizens of the EU and NATO members. In the event of NATO declaring war on any country, Bosnian Croats are under the military obligation of Croatia as its citizens.

The ambassador of the strongest NATO member doesn’t care about this. In 2007, he goes to the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH and demands that a war criminal, a serial killer of Croats in Bugojno, be removed from the investigation.

Therefore, the ambassador of the leading NATO member in BiH requests that a person deeply embedded in the Al Qaeda and ISIL structures, a person suspected of participating in mass shootings of NATO obligations in BiH, be spared from investigation for war crimes because, allegedly, this person is very important for NATO and for defense reform in BiH.

The ambassador of the strongest NATO member then writes statements composed by sympathizers of Al Qaeda in BiH and behaves all the time as a mercenary of that ideology.

The NATO ambassador in BiH will thus activate every time a deal is in sight and when the constitutional rights of the NATO people in BiH are to be restored.

All the while, NATO Croatia remains silent on this. We simply do not see the point of Croatia staying in NATO. No one will attack it, and staying in NATO costs.

If the funds that Croatia invests in NATO were directed towards international lobbying against the NATO ambassador in BiH – Murphy, the world could learn the following:

All American media would know that:

• The Hague Tribunal did not prosecute a single member of Al Qaeda who was involved in the genocide in Grabovica.
• Not a single one who was involved in the destruction of the WTC and was a member of the Bosnian Muslim Army.
• The New York Times would know that the US ambassador is protecting ISIL members in BiH and demanding that they not be prosecuted because they are “important for NATO”.
• They would know that the people of Petra Herceg Tomić are being driven away from the idea of integration into the EU and NATO by the US ambassador and that he practically works for the Russian cause.
• Then the Americans would know that the US ambassador is stopping the southern gas interconnection by blackmailing the NATO people in BiH that the headquarters of that interconnection must be in Al Qaeda city – Sarajevo and that he pays for ordered articles in the New York Times where Mostar, the only multi-ethnic city in BiH, is called the city of Croatian chauvinism.
• Perhaps even the New York Times would write an article about how that man should have been withdrawn from BiH a long time ago considering the abuse of the position he holds.
• And that he abused Blinken, sending him two “private letters” addressed to Radman and Konaković, in which Blinken writes to two people he practically doesn’t know, in the midst of this mess with Ukraine and Palestine, blindly signing everything that that corrupt stooge of Al Qaeda, a stooge on an American salary, sends to him.
• If Croatia momentarily loved its people, especially us border guards who contributed to its freedom, if it threatened to leave NATO because of the relationship of American jihadists towards the only NATO people, everything would change.

America would allow the BiH Prosecutor’s Office to prosecute Murphy. Washington would apologize to the Croats in BiH, and the New York Times would finally write the truth about BiH.

Perhaps they would even write a text about how a man, who, in front of the monument of Petra Herceg Tonić, a Croat from Ljubuški, and a US national hero, demanded that the Croatian flag be removed, embarrassed the USA right in Ljubuški.

But before the nephew of Petra Herceg and his family return the decorations to the State Department, as a sign of solidarity with us, rather than Croatia sending a message to the State Department that such humiliation can no longer be endured and simply leaving the cursed NATO.

So let the damned jihadist from Bugojno explain to his bosses what he was doing in BiH.

The conclusion of the text is as follows: Croatia did everything not to protect its own geopolitical interest in BiH. Since joining NATO, it has been building museums in BiH, promoting the Office for Museums and Milas, and its geopolitical interest is where Murphy tells it. It has come down to us, our people. The jihadist ambassador determines where the bodies managing the gas pipeline we are building will be.

If Jihad and the USA have an agreement that the management of that pipeline must be under Muslims, then let the Muslims roll up their sleeves and dig channels from Dalmatia to Sarajevo. Then let them determine the management themselves.

In doing so, they should certainly be careful that when digging through Bugojno, they do not come across Cikotić’s and Murphy’s political and physical legacy – the bodies of slain Croats.

What must not be talked about. What the writer Lujanović spoke about the other day. That interview that most of our politicians don’t have time to read.

Otherwise, dear “nation,” in the pauses between two Lenten dawn prayers, tell your representatives in the Parliament of BiH FBIH and Croatia that you thank them for regularly diverting the public focus on this issue. You really have representatives as you deserve.

Iurkov L Poskok.info